DIACHRONY OF LINGUISTIC CHANGE
Academic Year 2024/2025 - Teacher: VALERIA DI CLEMENTEExpected Learning Outcomes
Course Structure
Required Prerequisites
Attendance of Lessons
The exam programme is identical both for attending and non-attending students.
Students who are unable to attend classes are invited to contact the teacher at least one month before taking the exam.
Detailed Course Content
Textbook Information
1) Nicoletta Francovich Onesti, L’inglese dalle origini ad oggi. Le vicende di una lingua, Roma 1988 (and more recent editions and reprints), chapters 1-7 (p. 1 to 165).
2) Philip Durkin, Borrowed Words. A History of Loanwords in English, Oxford 2014 (part I-V, pp. 3-297).
3) Passages from significant Old English and Middle English texts (see 6).
4) Reference dictionaries: J. Bosworth, T. N. Toller, An Anglo-Saxon Dictionary, available at https://www.ling.upenn.edu/~kurisuto/germanic/oe_bosworthtoller_about.html, or other electronic version; H. Kurath et al., Middle English Dictionary, electronic version https://quod.lib.umich.edu/m/middle-english-dictionary/dictionary
5) Reference grammar books: Gemma Manganella, L’anglosassone e il sassone antico, Napoli, 1960 (see 6); Joseph Wright and Mary Elizabeth Wright, An Elementary Middle English Grammar, London et al., 1921 (available at archive.org).
6) Supplementary materials (downloadable from the Studium web page dedicated to the course; registration required).
N.B. Grammar books and dictionaries are consultation works.
Learning Assessment
Learning Assessment Procedures
Two ongoing tests tests will be held, not compulsory and open to all attending and non-attending students, which will consist of closed questions, lasting c. 30 minutes each.
For the evaluation in the final oral exam, the mastery of the contents and skills acquired, the linguistic accuracy, the argumentative ability demonstrated by the candidate and the ability to apply what has been learned even in new tasks. The positive evaluation obtained in the tests will also be taken into account. Minimum requirenents are reached when one is able to place the facts exactly from a geographical and chronological point of view and when one is able to describe the topics in their essential characteristics.
The oral exam is evaluated through a special evaluation grid that will be adequately publicized.
Criteria of evaluation (oral exams)
|
Correctness and pertinence |
Pertinent |
30 |
|
Pertinent with some uncorrectness |
29 - 27 |
|
|
Substantially pertinent |
26 - 23 |
|
|
Sufficiently pertinent, but not precise |
22 - 18 |
|
|
Completeness |
Complete |
30 |
|
Small details lacking |
29 - 27 |
|
|
One to two significant details lacking |
26 - 23 |
|
|
Partial, but the student is able to complete their answer thanks to suggestions |
22 - 18 |
|
|
Appropriate language and use of technical terms |
Uses the technical vocabulary easily and appropriately |
30 - 28 |
|
Has a good command of the technical vocabulary |
27 - 25 |
|
|
Substantially commands the technical vocabulary |
24 - 21 |
|
|
Has difficulties in using the technical vocabulary appropriately |
20 - 18 |
|
|
Critical argumentation |
Reflects on the proposed task and finds new comparisons and links easily |
30 - 28 |
|
Needs some suggestions |
27 - 24 |
|
|
Is able to make connections, but needs guiding |
23 -18 |
|
|
Previous knowledge (spatial-temporal coordinates, knowledge of basic concepts of linguistics) |
Commands all the spatial-temporal coordinates and the linguistic metalexicon easily and well |
30 - 28 |
|
Has a good command of the spatial-temporal coordinates and the linguistic metalexicon |
27 - 25 |
|
|
Has a substantial command of the spatial-temporal coordinates and the linguistic metalexicon |
24 - 21 |
|
|
Commands the spatial-temporal coordinates and the linguistic metalexicon roughly, makes mistakes and needs suggestions |
20 - 18 |